Use Case
Instrument Panel for E-Mobility
Instrument Panel for E-Mobility is a Use Case of:
Service
IMG Thermoforming Machine
Go to product
Interested in this use case? An employee of Machinecraft Thermoforming Automotive is at your disposal.
Rushabh
Director
Get insights into the use cases of Machinecraft Thermoforming Automotive
Use Case
Instrument Panel for E-Mobility
Automotive, E-Mobility
### Summary of Lightweight Material for Instrument Panels (IP) & Door Panels (DP) Compared to Slush Molding The material from Tatsuta Chemical is used for **instrument panels (IP) and door panels (DP)** in automobiles, providing **lightweight, high-quality surface finishes**. Here’s how it compares to **slush molding**: #### **1. Thermoforming vs. Slush Molding** - **Thermoforming Process (Used with Tatsuta Material)**: - Uses a **pre-formed sheet** heated and vacuum-formed over a mold. - Less material wastage. - Can integrate **reinforcements** like back-foaming to add structure without extra weight. - **Consistent thickness** leading to more predictable mechanical properties. - **Slush Molding**: - Uses **PVC powder**, which is poured into a mold, heated, and then excess material is removed. - Results in **thicker** and **heavier parts** due to the nature of the material build-up. - Involves **higher material waste**. #### **2. Weight Reduction** - Tatsuta’s material is **lighter** because: - Uses **TPO-based skin** instead of **PVC** (PVC is denser). - Can be reinforced with **lightweight foams** or substrates. - Thermoformed parts **require less resin**, unlike slush-molded parts which accumulate extra material. - **Example of Weight Difference**: - **Slush-molded IP**: ~4.5–5 kg per set. - **Thermoformed IP with lightweight reinforcement**: ~3.2–3.8 kg per set. - **Savings of 20-30% in weight**, leading to better fuel efficiency. #### **3. Cost & Process Efficiency** - **Lower Material Cost**: Thermoforming allows the use of **co-extruded sheets**, reducing material consumption. - **Lower Cycle Time**: **Thermoforming process cycle time ~90-120 sec**, compared to **slush molding (~180 sec or more)**. - **No Need for Secondary Processing**: Slush molding often requires **post-processing steps like trimming and edge folding**, whereas **thermoforming integrates these into the process**. #### **4. Aesthetic & Durability Advantages** - Tatsuta’s **TPO-based sheets**: - **Better UV resistance** (less yellowing over time). - **Softer touch feel** without the weight of thick PVC layers. - **Easier to texture** compared to slush-molded PVC skins. #### **5. Market Adoption in India** - **Thermoforming + Press Lamination** is becoming popular in **premium vehicles** due to: - Weight savings leading to **higher fuel efficiency**. - **Sustainability concerns** (TPO-based vs. PVC-based skins). - Growing adoption by **OEMs like Suzuki, Tata, Hyundai**. ### **Conclusion** Thermoformed surfaces using Tatsuta’s materials offer **significant weight savings (~30%)**, faster cycle times, and **improved material efficiency** compared to slush molding. This makes them ideal for **cost-effective, high-quality automotive interior production**.